Claims by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko that “international powers” are organising a web-up of troops on the country’s border are baseless, says Nato.
Wearing military fatigues, the president acknowledged he had placed his military on “excessive alert”.
Protests persevered within the streets of Minsk on Saturday following a disputed election two weeks within the past.
Demonstrators are annoying that Mr Lukashenko stand down.
The leader, who has dominated Belarus for 26 years, claimed the Nato bloc became once looking to separate up Belarus and set up a brand fresh president in Minsk.
He acknowledged troops in Poland and Lithuania were readying themselves, and that he became once transferring his military to the country’s western border.
“They’re rocking the grief inside of our country, looking to fall the authorities,” Mr Lukashenko acknowledged, in conjunction with that he ordered his security chiefs to “procure the toughest measures to defend the territorial integrity of our country.”
Nato rejected the affirm, asserting it posed “no threat to Belarus or any other country and has no military web-up within the distance. Our posture is precisely defensive.”
“The regime is making an attempt to divert attention from Belarus’s internal problems at any fee with fully baseless statements about imaginary external threats,” Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda suggested AFP data agency.
A Polish presidency decent called the recommendation that Poland planned any border destablisation “regime propaganda” by the Belarusians, which became once “sad and surprising”. “Poland… has no such design,” the decent added.
Nato entreated Belarus to appreciate the elementary human rights of its electorate.
Mr Lukashenko became once re-elected president on 9 August but the vote became once widely thought to be to be false. Protests disputing the result were met with a brutal crackdown that killed on the least four other folks and demonstrators acknowledged they’ve been tortured in prisons and detention centres.
Belarus – the fundamental facts
The achieve is Belarus? It has Russia – its feeble imperial master – to the east and Ukraine to the south. To the north and west lie EU and Nato contributors Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.
Why does it matter? Care for Ukraine, this nation of 9.5 million is caught in competitors between the West and Russia. President Lukashenko, an ally of Russia, has been nicknamed “Europe’s final dictator”. He has been in energy for 26 years, preserving grand of the economy in insist hands, and the utilization of censorship and police crackdowns against opponents.
What goes on on there? Now there is a colossal opposition dash, annoying fresh, democratic management and financial reform. They are saying Mr Lukashenko rigged the 9 August election – officially he won by a landslide. His supporters notify his toughness has saved the country accurate.
The president has vowed to crush the unrest and has previously blamed the dissent on unnamed “international-backed revolutionaries”.
On Saturday crowds of protestors waved moving lights from cell telephones and flew Belarusian flags within the streets of Minsk whereas chanting “freedom”.
Police tried to disperse bigger than 1,000 other folks gathered within town’s Independence Square, in accordance with Interfax data agency.
A “team spirit” chain of quite loads of oldsters, many carrying white, shaped earlier within the day on the busy Komarovka looking market.
It follows the country’s perfect relate in contemporary history final weekend when quite loads of thousands crammed the streets.
Opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, who became once forced into exile the day after the election, vowed to “stand till the finish” within the protests.
She suggested the BBC that if the dash stopped now, they’d be “slaves.” “We have not any ethical to step abet now,” she acknowledged.
Ms Tikhanovskaya suggested the BBC Belarusians had voted for her, not as a future president but as a “symbol of adjustments”.
“They were shouting for his or her future, for his or her procure to stay in a free country, against violence, for his or her rights,” she acknowledged, in her simplest interview with a Western media outlet.